ICOS Name of
the Month
Archive:
Motlalepula
Brighton
Regensburg
PISA
The name of the month for our Congress is short and quite difficult.
Pisa is a name of pre-Roman, and possibly even pre-Etruscan, origin
about which nothing can be said with certainty. It is remarkable
that its name has remained
almost unchanged through all the history of the Italian peninsula.
In Roman times it was known as Pisae. It was classed by Dionysius
(I. p16) as being among the earliest cities of
Italy, either taken from the Siculi, or subsequently built by the
confederate Pelasgi and Aborigines. Another tradition ascribes its
foundation to a Greek colony from Elis in Arcadia, whose members named it
after the city of Pisai in their home country; yet another tradition
makes a connection with the Greeks who wandered
to Italy after the Trojan War, in one account Epeus, the maker of the
wooden horse, and in another some followers of Nestor of Pylos
(Serv. ad Aen. X.
179; Strabo, V. p222). The most widely believed story in classical times
seems to have been the one connecting it with Pisai in Arcadia (Virg. Aen.
loc. cit.; Serv. ad
loc.; Plin. III. 8; Claudian. de Bel. Gildon. 483; Rutil. I. 565, 573;
Solinus, Polyh. VIII). There are still other possibilities: in one, Servius
assigns it to the Celts; in another that its site is said to have been
occupied by an
earlier town, by some called Phocis, by others Teuta, whose inhabitants
the Teutae, Teutani, or Teutones, were of Greek race. Plin. III. 8., Cato
(ap. Serv.) accepted that this area was indeed originally in the territory
of the Teutones, who spoke Greek, but could not trace the foundation of
Pisae back further than the Etruscans; and he ascribes it to Tarchon.
Most accounts seem to accept that Greeks had a hand in the stablishment
of Pisae. This seems to be confirmed by the coincidence with the name
of the town in the Peloponnese. On the other hand the name may
have coincidentally suggested this connection.
Servius says the name meant `moon-shaped port' in Lydian (i.e.
Etruscan). But the site of the city, on an open
plain, is unlike that of most Etruscan cities, and it may well therefore
not be
an Etruscan foundation.
Compiled by Richard Coates
